OperTiva Intelligence · The engine
We are not an AI company. We are an engineering firm.
Thirty years building and sustaining industrial automation technology for some of North America's largest industrial operators. OperTiva Intelligence is that experience, made repeatable — more than algorithms, and not a model trained on the internet.
Bring us one OT input and watch it go through
- What is the real risk?
- What is left after you fix it?
Where it sits
Two products. One engine underneath.
Managed sustainment. Five input sources monitored, triaged, risk-assessed, costed and prioritised — then the work executed.
Standards-based assessment. 298 questions across fifteen standards, scored against your plant, with gaps becoming costed programme improvements.
Both run on the same engine. That is why a Setpoint gap and a Continuum signal arrive costed the same way, ranked on the same basis, with the same reasoning behind them.
What it is made of
Thirty years of engineering, encoded.
Four bodies of knowledge, assembled by engineers doing this work at real plants — then encoded so it produces the same answer on a Tuesday night as it does in a Monday review. The algorithms are the smallest part of it.
Thirty years of InnoTech projects and sustainment across midstream, petrochemical, pulp, mining and power. What actually fails, and what actually fixes it.
IEC 62443, IEC 61511, ISA-18.2, ISA-101, ISO 27019, NIST 800-82, API and IEEE — mapped to questions, hazards and consequences rather than quoted.
Six device classes, 62 failure categories, 144 failure modes. Operator research across 43 plants. Documented incidents, sourced and cited.
Lifecycle state, end-of-support dates, firmware currency and advisory streams across the platforms actually installed in Western Canadian plants.
How it works on one input
The chassis. Twelve stages, every signal, every time.
“Stop providing reporting-only solutions that don't drive decisions.”Corporate technical authority · The Operator Research Report
Six of the twelve stages, shown publicly. The remainder cover execution, evidence and closure.
The last stage is the one nobody else offers. When the work is done, Intelligence states what risk remains and why — because a solution that claims to leave nothing behind is a solution nobody thought about.
Why it can be trusted
The same inputs always produce the same answer.
Intelligence reasons and writes. It does not rank, and it never touches a dollar figure. Selection is deterministic, money is arithmetic, and every number traces to something you supplied or something a person reviewed and signed. Where you have not given us a number, you get a blank — never an estimate dressed as a fact.
Nothing reaches you that a named engineer has not approved. It is enforced in the system, not by process.
Every question, clause, hazard and consequence is a real record — not generated text that resembles one.
See it work
Give us one OT input. Take it to a costed decision.
A vendor advisory, an end-of-life notice, an alarm you keep seeing. Tell us the device and what you observed, and the chassis takes it through to a residual you can defend.
- The risk, scored, and why
- Three paths — break/fix, MoC, or accept and monitor
- Solution options, each with what it leaves behind
- Cost four ways, and the production at risk if you defer
No login, nothing installed, nothing touches your network.