OperTiva Setpoint · Standards-based assessment

No single engineer carries all of this. Setpoint does.

298 questions across fifteen standards — IEC, ISA, ISO, NIST, API — each carrying the hazard it protects against, the consequence class, and who typically owns it. Run it yourself, or have our team run it. The first self-assessment is free.

Tell us your plant, the year it was commissioned and any major upgrades

  • What would be assessed?
  • Why does it matter here?
Start the mini-assessment

What you are getting access to

A consultant brings what they know. This brings what the standards know.

“SME involvement and shared ownership, so risk is not carried by one or two internal champions.”Asked for independently by two operators · The Operator Research Report
Your team runs it

Same question library, same scoring, same outputs. No consultant on site, no day rate, no scheduling around somebody else's calendar. The first self-assessment is free.

Or we run it for you

Our engineers work the same library, attach the evidence and sign it off. Same result, produced by people who do it every week — for when you would rather not spend your own hours on it.

The library is one layer of OperTiva Intelligence — thirty years of InnoTech consulting, industry data and vendor information, made repeatable. Setpoint is how you reach it through an assessment.

What Setpoint delivers

Four outcomes. None of them are a report.

A position you can defend

Where you stand against IEC, ISA, ISO, NIST and API — with the evidence attached and a snapshot nobody can quietly edit afterwards. For leadership, an auditor, an insurer, or a board that has started asking.

A funded improvement programme

A short, ranked list of programme improvements — each costed across software, hardware, professional services and your own internal hours, and each mapped to the production it protects.

Every plant on the same footing

Twelve sites scored the same way, comparable for the first time — and each one set against the profile for plants of the same type, age and instrumentation level.

Proof that it improved

Re-assess against a frozen baseline and show the delta, with the evidence behind it. The thing you need when somebody asks what last year's money bought.

Assessments are commissioned for a reason — an incident, an insurance renewal, a regulatory review, an acquisition, an audit, or an annual cycle. Setpoint carries a profile for each, so the output arrives in the shape the person asking for it needs.

How it gets there

The 1–5 maturity score is the instrument, not the outcome.

“A one-size-fits-all score with no site context.”Named by operators as something not to build · The Operator Research Report

They told us not to build that, so we did not. Every score is weighted by what is actually installed at your site, its Purdue level, and the production consequence of it failing — the same question scores differently at a compressor station and at a refinery, because it should. The score is how the four outcomes above get produced. On its own it is just a number.

No defined practice
★★Ad hoc, individual-dependent
★★★Defined and followed
★★★★Measured and reviewed
★★★★★Improving on evidence

Below three stars, the finding stops being a finding. It becomes a costed, ranked programme improvement.

Findings become funded work

Assessment gaps become work, not a register entry.

“Stop providing reporting-only solutions that don't drive decisions.”Corporate technical authority · The Operator Research Report
01Triaged
02Risk assessed
03Solutioned
04Remediation costed
05Prioritised

A gap below threshold is triaged, risk-assessed, solutioned and costed — software, hardware, professional services and the hours it takes from your own team — then ranked against everything else competing for the same budget. Setpoint stands on its own; you do not need Continuum to run it.

What it is not

Not a laundry list. A short list you can actually fund.

“Understanding what resources you need to mitigate a risk is as important, if not more, than identifying the risk.”OT and process safety risk lead · The Operator Research Report

What assessments usually produce

  • Sixty findings, ranked by severity alone
  • No cost, no hours, no sequence
  • A document that confirms what you already knew
  • Nothing that survives contact with a budget holder

What Setpoint produces

  • A minimal set of programme improvements, not tasks
  • Each mapped to the production it protects
  • Each costed four ways, including your internal hours
  • Configurable across every plant you run
The boundarySetpoint produces the score, the priorities and the costs. Which ones proceed, in what order, and at what level of accepted risk stays with you — and change-managed work runs through your MoC process, not ours.

Start with the mini-assessment

Four areas, five questions each. Then the written version.

Tell us the plant and its age and we will show you, on screen, the four areas a Setpoint assessment would open with and why they matter at a plant like yours. The detailed report behind that summary — clauses, consequences, ownership — comes by email.

Start the mini-assessment

Standards-referenced · free. Never shared.